Geekom GeekBook M16 evaluation: A battery life champion with flaws
In PCMark 10, the GeekBook M16 scores 6,678 factors, damaged down into 10,031 factors for Necessities, 8,496 factors for Productiveness, and 9,483 factors for Digital Content material Creation. The general rating is, by design, decrease than the person outcomes as a result of inside weighting of take a look at classes. It is a stable, however not excellent end result. Its in-house counterpart, the GeekBook X16 Professional, scores 8,256 factors regardless of having an similar CPU. Even the Lenovo Yoga 9i, which boasts a extra energy-efficient Intel Core Extremely 7 258V, manages 7,719 factors.
Christoph Hoffmann
Nonetheless, the explanation for this measurable efficiency shortfall lies solely partly with the RAM. A more in-depth have a look at the system settings reveals that Geekom retains the M16 on a really tight leash with regards to energy consumption throughout on a regular basis use. Whereas the system does briefly ramp up throughout brief bursts of load, the CPU is throttled early throughout typical productiveness duties to maximise battery life and preserve temperatures low throughout the slim chassis. The GeekBook due to this fact intentionally sacrifices computing energy within the identify of effectivity and quiet operation. Because of this, the Core Extremely 9 performs nearer to a throttled Core Extremely 7.
The GeekBook M16 isn’t a basic all-rounder, however a extremely specialised workhorse with a really clear trade-off.
Within the 3DMark CPU profile, the M16 achieves 7,071 factors at most thread utilization, placing it forward of the X16 Professional, which scored 6,741 factors. Scores throughout the totally different thread ranges – starting from 937 factors with a single core as much as the aforementioned most – show the hybrid structure’s easy scaling between efficiency and effectivity cores.
Christoph Hoffmann
Relating to graphics, the draw back of the Meteor Lake platform turns into obvious. Time Spy awards the built-in Arc graphics 3,935 complete factors, of which 3,545 are for pure graphics efficiency. That’s virtually similar to the X16 Professional’s 4,073 factors. The Yoga 9i, with its newer Lunar Lake GPU, outperforms it with 4,716 factors, regardless of having half the variety of CPU cores.
