Acer made a 1,000Hz monitor, and sure, it prices over $1,000
“The Acer Predator XB253Q U1 hits 1,000Hz” is what you might want to know, that’s the tweet, however Acer’s making use of some particular sauce of its personal to make this beast stand out from LG’s just lately launched 1,000Hz show. It’s loaded with Acer’s “Visible Response Enhance Professional” expertise to fight the ghosting and blurring generally present in TN panels, together with FreeSync and G-Sync Suitable assist to synchronize the monitor refresh fee along with your GPU to remove ugly display tearing. Acer additionally says its Round Polarizer expertise will “scale back glare and eye pressure throughout longer gaming periods.”
Counter-Strike and League of Legends matches can actually stretch late into the night, so it appears like a useful function to slap on an esports monitor!
And there’s little doubt that that is an esports monitor: The 24.5-inch display dimension helps you to maintain your complete battle in view, and its 1080p decision is favored by esports professionals seeking to speed up body charges (and thus responsiveness) to godlike ranges.
However is the juice well worth the budgetary squeeze? That’s the query I maintain coming again to with these 1,000Hz screens — since you’re paying over a buck for every of these frames. The Acer Predator XB253Q U1 will value $1,099 when it launches within the first quarter of 2027.
Now look, I’m in all probability the sweatiest esports competitor at PCWorld. I’m a fiend for quick body charges and the crack reflexes they permit. However for $1,099 American {dollars}? I haven’t examined this beast however off the cuff, that’s gonna be a no from me dawg.
A few of my colleagues scoff at ultra-high refresh fee screens, saying they don’t discover a distinction going above 160Hz or so. And that’s completely superb — however should you play esports typically and aggressively, there is an excellent likelihood you’ll carry out higher with a sooner monitor. However the issue is the most important profit — responsiveness — doesn’t scale the way in which you would possibly assume it does.
