PNY Duo Hyperlink V3 assessment: A flexible USB flash drive for light-duty use
Professional’s Score
Execs
- Good on a regular basis 10Gbps efficiency
- Sort-C and Sort-A connectors
- Reasonably priced for the capacities
Cons
- The slowest off-cache write velocity we’ve ever seen
Our Verdict
For mild offloads out of your iPhone or different gadget, the PNY Duo Hyperlink V3 performs effectively, and with each Sort-A and Sort-C connectors built-in, it will probably used with most any gadget. However efficiency off secondary cache is abysmal, so purchase far more capability than you want.
Value When Reviewed
This worth will present the geolocated pricing textual content for product undefined
Greatest Pricing At the moment
Greatest Costs At the moment: PNY Duo Hyperlink V3
With at present’s mixture of legacy Sort-A and newer Sort-C ports, it pays to have the ability to hook up with each. Nevertheless, adapters have this nasty behavior of being misplaced, so a tool that has each connector varieties captive on board, such because the PNY Duo Hyperlink V3 reviewed right here, can prevent loads of grief.
The caveat right here is write efficiency, which falls off a cliff in case you run out of secondary cache. For many situations, this gained’t come into play, but it surely did in our testing — so learn that part fastidiously.
Word: In case your nonetheless leveraging older Apple gadgets with a Lightning connector — then look to a few of PNY’s older Duo Hyperlinks that are Lighting/Sort-A.
What are the PNY Duo Hyperlink V3’s options?
In the beginning, the Duo Hyperlink V3 is an 10Gbps USB SSD. I get the query on a regular basis: What’s the distinction between an SSD and a flash/thumb drive. Kind issue — nothing else, although the latter do are typically a bit mild in efficiency. As SSD stands for stable state storage, and thumb drives have at all times used NAND, they’re legitimately SSDs.

Past that, the Duo Hyperlink is an roughly 2-inch lengthy black rectangle of an SSD that swivels in a really stable metallic sleeve to disclose both its Sort-A or Sort-C connector (lead picture), or each (the above picture), in case you so need. There are tiny stops so the drive clicks in place at 180, 360, or 90 levels.
Weight is a mere 1.5 ounces, although that feels fairly stable given the small measurement. I do have a few nits in regards to the design. One or each of the connectors are at all times uncovered, leaving them prey to the weather. Additionally, the drive matches reasonably loosely within the shell and I’m not 100% optimistic in regards to the long-term prospects of the swivel/cease mechanism.
PNY by no means clued me in on the kind of NAND and controller chip on board, and I used to be detest to interrupt out my hammer. No matter they’re, they’re fantastic for regular obligation.
How a lot does the PNY Duo Hyperlink V3 value?
The Duo Hyperlink is offered in 256GB/$34, 512GB/$53, 1TB/$86 (examined), and 2TB/$167 capacities. That’s fairly darn reasonably priced for an SSD, or flash drive. However once more, learn the efficiency part fastidiously — you’ll perceive at the very least a part of the rationale the Duo Hyperlink V3 is so low cost.
How briskly is the PNY Duo Hyperlink V3?
The PNY Duo Hyperlink V3 is your regular 10Gbps USB performer studying, and writing — with smaller quantities of information, as much as round 240GB with our 1TB check unit.
However in case you exceed the quantity of secondary cache whereas writing as we did within the 450GB write, it morphs into the slowest SSD I’ve ever examined — by rather a lot.
However first, light-duty efficiency. As you possibly can see under, CrystalDiskMark 8 rated the Duo Hyperlink V3’s sequential switch velocity as proper according to the thumb drive competitors.

Random efficiency can be fairly sprightly in accordance the CrystalDiskMark 8, cleansing the SK Hynix T31’s clock. By the best way, until acknowledged in any other case, the ATTO and AS SSD benchmarks are roughly in settlement with CrystalDiskMark 8 numbers we submit.

When solely transferring 48GB price of information, the Duo Hyperlink V3 was proper up there with its opponents on the chart: the Seagate Extremely Compact SSD and SK Hynix T31.

As famous, after secondary cache is exhausted the Duo Hyperlink V3 goes south to a level I’ve by no means seen earlier than. I spent the higher a part of the day operating the 450GB write exams, the quickest of which was barely beneath two hours. By the use of comparability, the slowest arduous drive I’ve examined took solely 75 minutes and the earlier slowest SSD (one other thumb drive), 52 minutes.
Pace began at close to 650MBps, then after roughly 250GB had been written, dropped to and vacillated between 15MBps and 100MBps — largely in the direction of the previous. That is remarkably gradual for any kind of NAND, even QLC.

The 450GB write outcome ruined the drive’s total ranking, however to be truthful, the Duo Hyperlink V3 is about light-duty comfort, not heavy-duty workloads. I’ll forgive it — and by no means attempt to write 450GB to it once more.
Word that each the Seagate Extremely Compact and SK Hynix T31 have been 2TB, whereas the PNY Duo Hyperlink V3 was solely a 1TB drive. Fairly seemingly the 2TB capability of the Duo Hyperlink V3 would’ve turned in a time aggressive with the opposition — and tanked proper after that.

On the plus facet, the PNY Duo Hyperlink V3 recovered shortly after slowdowns — i.e., subsequent writes would proceed apace after a couple of minutes of relaxation. Additionally, few customers will ever write 450GB of contiguous information. We do for the particular function of discovering the NAND’s native write fee.
Must you purchase the PNY duo hyperlink V3?
For many customers, the comfort of the Duo Hyperlink V3’s dual-connectivity will outweigh doable points with lengthy writes they might by no means carry out. For mild obligation, it’s fantastic.
If, nevertheless, you frequently write giant quantities of information, say over 25 p.c of no matter capability you purchase, then search one other answer.
How we check
Drive exams at present make the most of Home windows 11 24H2, 64-bit operating off of a PCIe 4.0 Samsung 990 Professional in an Asus Z890-Creator WiFi (PCIe 4.0/5.0) motherboard. The CPU is a Core Extremely i5 225 feeding/fed by two Kingston Fury 32GB DDR5 4800MHz modules (64GB of reminiscence complete). Each 20Gbps USB and Thunderbolt 5 are built-in and Intel CPU/GPU graphics are used. SSDs concerned within the check are mounted in a HighPoint 7604A 16x PCIe 5.0 adapter card.
We run the CrystalDiskMark 8, AS SSD 2, and ATTO 4 artificial benchmarks to search out the storage gadget’s potential efficiency, then a collection of 48GB and 450GB transfers exams utilizing Home windows Explorer drag and drop to indicate what you’ll see beneath Window, in addition to the far quicker Xcopy to indicate what’s doable.
The 48GB switch exams make the most of an USFMount RAM disk taking over 58GB of the 64GB of complete reminiscence. The 450GB file is transferred from one other SSD on the HighPoint card.
Every check is carried out on a newly NTFS-formatted and TRIM’d drive so the outcomes are optimum. Word that in regular use, as a drive fills up, efficiency could lower as a result of much less NAND for secondary caching, in addition to different elements. This may be much less of an element with the present crop of SSDs with far quicker late-generation NAND.
Caveat: The efficiency numbers proven apply solely to the drive we have been shipped and to the capability examined. SSD efficiency can and can range by capability as a result of extra or fewer chips to shotgun reads/writes throughout and the quantity of NAND out there for secondary caching. Distributors additionally often swap elements. If you happen to ever discover a big discrepancy between the efficiency you expertise and that which we report, by all means, tell us.