Samsung Odyssey OLED G6: This monitor hits 500Hz in fashion

Greatest Costs As we speak: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6

The Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF is an uncommon show, not simply because it has a 500Hz QD-OLED panel. Although it has a super-high-refresh panel able to dealing with world-class aggressive esports, the G60SF additionally delivers an aesthetic design and a matte show coat that maximizes usability in a variety of lighting.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 (G60SF) specs and options

The Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF, recognized extra merely because the Odyssey OLED G6, is all in regards to the refresh price, which reaches as excessive as 500Hz. As of late October 2025, it’s considered one of simply three QD-OLED screens to supply a 500Hz refresh. The others are the Asus ROG Strix XG27AQDPG, which I’ve beforehand reviewed, and the MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50.

• Show measurement: 26.5-inch 16:9 facet ratio
• Native decision: 2560×1440
• Panel sort: QD-OLED
• Refresh price: 500Hz
• Adaptive Sync: Sure, AMD FreeSync Premium Professional, G-Sync appropriate
• HDR: VESA DisplayHDR 500
• Ports: 2x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x USB-B Upstream, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 downstream, 3.5mm audio jack
• Audio: None
• Further options: RGB-LED lighting ring on rear of monitor
• Worth: $999.99 MSRP

And it’s actually the refresh price that may carry the Odyssey G60SF to victory, or defeat, as a result of it’s in any other case a typical QD-OLED monitor. It sticks to 1440p decision and lacks USB-C. The monitor’s MSRP is $999.99, which is $100 greater than the Asus various.

Learn on to be taught extra, then see our roundup of the very best gaming screens for comparability.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF design

The Odyssey OLED G60SF’s design is a win. Samsung switched to a brand new, extra skilled look a pair generations in the past, and the Odyssey G60SF delivers the very best rendition accessible. The rear of the monitor is product of glossy, silver metallic—not plastic, like most opponents—and appears extra like a high-end skilled monitor than a gaming show. Whether or not you favor the Asus or the Samsung is determined by the aesthetic you’re going for however, personally, I just like the Asus higher.

Although it’s largely demure, the G60SF does add some aptitude with a pretty RGB-LED mild ring. The ring will be custom-made and consists of CoreSync, a characteristic that syncs the LED mild with content material proven on-screen for a extra immersive expertise. The LED lights are dim, although, so CoreSync isn’t that noticeable except your gaming den may be very darkish.

Matthew Smith / Foundry

The G60SF is connected to a sturdy stand with a small, flat base that minimizes the area it occupies in your desk. Most opponents have swapped to this fashion of stand in recent times, but it surely’s nonetheless price point out, as wider tripod-style stands are nonetheless discovered on some gaming screens. The stand adjusts for top, tilt, swivel, and may pivot 90 levels (as much as 92 levels, to be exact) to be used in portrait orientation. A 100x100mm VESA mount can also be accessible to be used with third-party monitor stands and arms.

Most 27-inch gaming screens on this worth vary have the identical options, but it surely’s good to see Samsung nail the basics.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF connectivity and audio

The Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF’s connectivity is disappointing, although no extra so than its competitors. Video connectivity consists of two HDMI 2.1 and one DisplayPort 1.4 for a complete of three video inputs, which is typical for a gaming monitor. Nevertheless, the monitor lacks USB-C and as a substitute gives simply two USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 ports, each pushed by a USB-B upstream port.

As talked about, that is typical for a high-refresh gaming OLED. The Asus ROG Strix XG27AQDPG has the identical port format. The MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50 does embody a USB-C port, but it surely has simply 15 watts of Energy Supply, which isn’t sufficient to provide a Home windows laptop computer.

Some 4K OLED screens, just like the MSI MPG 272URX, present USB-C with 65 watts or 90 watts of Energy Supply, which is nice if you wish to join a laptop computer alongside a desktop. The MSI is a 4K 240Hz monitor, so it’s not a direct competitor to the 500Hz Samsung—but it surely’s one thing to remember.

Audio system will not be included. That’s frequent for a gaming monitor, as most players favor to make use of a headset or desktop audio system. A 3.5mm audio pass-through is supplied.

The Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF supplies an easy-to-use joystick tucked barely off-center behind the monitor’s proper decrease lip. It’s used to navigate a legible, well-organized menu system. The font measurement is barely smaller than I’d favor, however needs to be readable for most individuals.

I’m much less enthused in regards to the vary of picture high quality choices. In contrast to the Asus XG27AQDPG, the Samsung G60SF doesn’t present exactly focused gamma or shade temperature values and has a really slim variety of picture high quality presets.

Because the SDR testing will present, this doesn’t imply the picture high quality is worse—but it surely does make the picture high quality a bit extra annoying to tune. In order for you a gamma of two.4, for instance, you may’t change to that, however as a substitute should guess which of the supplied gamma settings comes near the gamma worth you need to see.

Samsung additionally lacks a Home windows app that surfaces all or most monitor options inside Home windows itself. Most opponents, together with Asus and Alienware/Dell, supply software program with that performance. Samsung does present Samsung Show Supervisor, but it surely largely exists for Home windows administration, not management of monitor options.

Matthew Smith / Foundry

Collectively, the generally imprecise menu settings and lack of a Home windows app for monitor management put the G60SF at an obstacle. It’s not a difficulty for those who are inclined to tune your monitor’s settings as soon as after which by no means contact them once more. However for those who typically change settings—maybe since you need an AdobeRGB mode for work, however then a Sport mode for play—the G60SF’s limitations may show annoying.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF SDR picture high quality

The Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF has (shock!) a Samsung QD-OLED panel. Such a OLED panel has turn into the gold normal for OLED screens, with solely LG’s WOLED offering competitors. Which is extraordinarily related, as a result of some LG WOLED screens obtain refresh price as much as 480Hz. Certainly, all of the screens I’ve included within the graph under are OLED or WOLED screens with a refresh price of 500Hz or 480Hz.

Matthew Smith / Foundry

The Odyssey G60SF will get off to an excellent begin with an SDR brightness of as much as 320 nits, which is a good end result for an OLED monitor. As of 2024, a brightness of round 250 nits was extra frequent—however we’re now beginning to see 300 nits or extra from flagship shows. A better most brightness means the G60SF works higher in rooms with vibrant lighting or many sunlit home windows.

Samsung’s matte show end additionally helps with readability and supplies an vital purpose customers would possibly select the G60SF over a competitor. Most OLED screens have a shiny end, which boosts perceived distinction and vibrance, at the price of elevated glare and reflections. The G60SF takes the alternative path, with minimal glare at the price of diminished perceived distinction and vibrance.

Personally, I favor Samsung’s strategy, although your opinion could differ. Remember the fact that the Asus ROG Strix XG27AQDPG, the opposite 500Hz QD-OLED presently accessible, has a shiny end.

Matthew Smith / Foundry

Subsequent up is distinction, the place all of the OLED screens supply equivalent efficiency. They’ve an successfully infinite distinction ratio as a result of they will attain a minimal brightness of zero nits. All of those screens have an immersive, deep picture, and so they’re nice for watching Netflix or enjoying darker video games, like Path of Exile 2 or the most recent Silent Hill.

As talked about earlier, the G60SF’s end has an influence on perceived distinction. This happens due to how mild scatters in another way throughout a matte panel end as in comparison with a shiny end. This doesn’t change the minimal luminance of every panel, nevertheless.

The sensible impact is that the XG27AQPDG could appear to be a bit extra distinction wealthy than the G60SF. I can discover this, however as talked about, I personally favor the diminished glare of a matte end over the improved perceived distinction of shiny. Your mileage could fluctuate.

Matthew Smith / Foundry

Coloration gamut is a win for the G60SF, which might show as much as one hundred pc of sRGB, 98 % of DCI-P3, and 95 % of AdobeRGB.

The Asus ROG Strix XG27AQDPG, which has the identical QD-OLED panel, is kind of tied with the G60SF. However opponents with the LG WOLED panel, such because the LG Ultragear 27GX790-AB, Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDP, and Sony M10S, all have a barely extra slender shade gamut at 96 % of DCI-P3 and 88 to 90 % of AdobeRGB.

With that stated, although, all of those screens have a really large shade gamut, and all of them will typically look vibrant and vivid in colourful content material. I wouldn’t essentially advocate one over the opposite solely due to the colour gamut. But when vivid shade is your high precedence, the G60SF will do the trick.

Matthew Smith / Foundry

The G60SF additionally delivers wonderful shade accuracy with a really low common shade error and no single shade displaying an error worth past 2, which is a good end result. Basically, the picture seems to be extremely lifelike and reveals no apparent inaccuracies. To be sincere, all OLED screens are inclined to carry out effectively right here—but it surely does appear that the QD-OLED screens have an edge over the WOLED competitors.

Gamma and shade temperature have been a slight miss for the G60SF. The default gamma worth was 2.3, barely off the goal of two.2, which suggests the picture can look a bit darker than it ought to. Many OLED screens have this downside, however the Asus XG27AQDPG managed to hit the goal gamma of two.2. The G60SF additionally displayed a shade temperature of 6200K, which is a bit hotter than the goal of 6500K. And since the G60SF’s menu has much less exact gamma and shade temperature choices than the Asus, you’ll have extra issue tuning these settings than you’d with different shows.

Sharpness is a weak level, as to be anticipated for a 1440p OLED show. Whereas sharpness has improved within the newest panels, we’re nonetheless speaking a few pixel density of about 110 pixels per inch throughout the 26.5-inch show. That’s not unhealthy, however 4K ups that to roughly 163 pixels per inch, which is a giant improve. And, after all, many 4K screens can be found at costs just like, or lower than, the G60SF.

Nonetheless, the G60SF’s total picture high quality is nice, as typical for a QD-OLED show. It doesn’t carry out any higher than its opponents, but in addition no worse, and the matte show coat offers the G60SF a novel promoting level that units it other than the alternate options.

Samsung Odyssey G60SF HDR picture high quality

I went into the Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF scorching off my evaluation of the Asus ROG Strix XG27AQDPG, the opposite 500Hz QD-OLED presently accessible. And the Asus was nice in HDR, so I anticipated the identical from the Samsung. Sadly, I used to be a bit disillusioned.

Matthew Smith / Foundry

Whereas I attempted to coax the best brightness doable from the G60SF with the monitor’s Peak Brightness setting and Energetic HDR tone mapping, the best sustained brightness I recorded was 678 nits. The Asus, in the meantime, achieved as much as 953 nits. It’s additionally brighter than the G60SF in all HDR situations.

The distinction was massive sufficient that I may simply discover it in subjective viewing. The Asus’ brightness can strike like lightning—generally actually, as is the case within the “Into the Storm” scene from Mad Max: Fury Highway. The G60SF nonetheless seems to be nice, but it surely didn’t sear my eyes with the identical brilliance.

With that stated, the G60SF’s HDR efficiency continues to be respectable total, and corresponding to quite a lot of OLED alternate options. It’s a wonderful choose for HDR—however undoubtedly not the very best.

Samsung Odyssey G60SF movement efficiency

However odds are you’re not shopping for the G60SF for HDR. You’re shopping for it for movement readability which, although not technically at odds with HDR, kinda is in observe—as a result of most situations the place you’d recreation at 500Hz will not be situations the place you’d need to be utilizing HDR. Movement readability is what issues most right here, and the G60SF delivers.

As I stated in my evaluation of the Asus ROG Strix XG27AQDPG, and in 480Hz screens earlier than that, the movement readability of an ultra-high-refresh OLED actually have to be seen to be believed. Scrolling take a look at pictures for a recreation like DOTA 2 reveals that just about all element is seen, proper right down to the names above characters and the ticks in hitpoint bars. Samples of scrolling textual content additionally present unimaginable readability. The textual content is almost as straightforward to learn as when it’s sitting nonetheless.

To be clear, I don’t assume there’s any noticeable distinction in readability between the brand new 500Hz QD-OLED screens and the 480Hz LG WOLED screens from 2024. Nonetheless, 500Hz is de facto one thing, and gamers who crave impeccable readability for aggressive esports play are going to like it.

Body pacing can be clean, as effectively, for those who have interaction AMD FreeSync Premium Professional or Nvidia G-Sync. Each adaptive sync requirements are supported.

Whereas the G60SF is nice for movement readability, the Asus XG27AQDPG has an additional characteristic known as Excessive Low Movement Blur. This inserts clean, black frames between current frames which, resulting from how people understand movement, has the impact of lowering movement blur. ELMB doesn’t work past 240Hz, so it doesn’t present the Asus an absolute movement readability benefit. Nevertheless, it does present barely improved readability at decrease refresh charges, like 120Hz or 240Hz. That may be useful, as a result of many video games received’t render at a body price excessive sufficient to exceed 240Hz.

That offers Asus an edge in total movement readability. It’s a small one, nevertheless, and does require that you just take the time to activate ELMB, because it doesn’t have interaction robotically.

Must you purchase the Samsung Odyssey G60SF?

The Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF is a good alternative if you would like an OLED monitor with wonderful movement readability. It supplies a wealthy, vibrant, vibrant 1440p picture at as much as 500Hz.

The G60SF faces just one downside: The Asus ROG Strix XG27AQPDG, which has the identical Samsung QD-OLED panel, is barely higher total. The Asus various supplies higher HDR efficiency, consists of ELMB for higher movement readability at 120Hz and 240Hz refresh charges, and is a little more feature-rich total with extras like a tripod mount on the highest of the stand and a Home windows app for managing monitor options.

With that stated, I discover myself in an odd place as a reviewer as a result of, if I have been selecting between these screens at this time, I might personally purchase the Samsung. I favor Samsung’s design. I additionally favor the matte end on the Samsung panel over the shiny end on the Asus.

So, whereas the Asus inarguably gives extra options at a decrease MSRP, the G60SF continues to be a fantastic 500Hz monitor—and it could be the one to purchase, relying in your preferences.