Vocal backlash forces Wikipedia to pause AI-generated summaries
AI-generated summaries are low-hanging fruit for apps and companies that need to soar on the AI bandwagon, as we’ve seen with Copilot, Google Drive, Amazon, and Adobe Acrobat. Lately, even the Wikimedia Basis gave it a go together with AI summaries in Wikipedia.
Now, nonetheless, 404 Media reviews that these plans have been placed on maintain after going through heavy criticism from Wikipedia’s human volunteer editors. You may learn the editors’ dialogue right here.
Some responded with a easy however easy “Yuck.” whereas others wrote considerate analyses, explaining how the AI-generated summaries might do fast and lasting harm to Wikipedia’s fame as a critical, reliable, hand-crafted useful resource.
The thought was that these AI-generated summaries would seem on the tops of articles in tabs that customers needed to manually open, and could be marked with a warning that summaries have been unverified.
It stays to be seen whether or not the Wikimedia Basis will shelve the AI-generated abstract function for good or whether or not they’ll rework it in a means that satisfies editors earlier than testing once more.
This text initially appeared on our sister publication PC för Alla and was translated and localized from Swedish.